Dear Stanley: This note is not in the nature of an "acknowledgment." It is to ask a question. Was Russell Davenport's memorandum ever used either in its entirety or in summary form?1 What I am getting at is "Would I be plagiarizing if I should use it almost as written?"2
My feeling is that if it was written for me to use at any time, Russell would have no great objection to my making use of it one of these fine days. At the same time, I do not want to be using something that has been made public before.
Of course, I would, in any event, do a bit of re-writing--but I would like to have the facts in the case. Thanks for remembering to send it to me, as well as for the editing job you did. As ever
P.S. With respect to the little "chore" we were talking about, what would you think of the following names in addition to your own?3
Ralph McGill4
Fred Seaton5
Donald Eastvold
Bill Francis (young lawyer of Houston)
Bob Burroughs6
John Lodge7
Fred Alger8
John McCone9
Bradshaw Mintener10
Charles Wilson
W. Alton Jones11
Lucius Clay
Bill Robinson
Cliff Roberts
If we could get quite a long list of representative people (most of them young) to work along the lines we had in mind, with only one or two to be present at almost every meeting--say yourself and Milton--we could, out of such a list make up little panels from time to time of one or two experienced business men to meet with two or three younger, possibly less cautious, individuals.
These names are just picked out of the air but everyone of them is an individual for whom I have considerable admiration for one reason or other.