Dear
Cabot: I agree with your feeling about the release to the papers of the names of my stag dinner guests, particularly where the dinner has a political complexion.1 Nevertheless, I think it is absolutely impractical to keep the names out of the papers. If we do not release the names, we will create great mystery on the part of the Washington press corps, and each reporter will be trying for a scoop, to the embarrassment of a lot of people.
The designation of the dinner as being attended by "1952 wheel horses" was the New York Times'--no one else's.2
Jim Duff has not been asked to one of the stag dinners because no member of Congress has been asked to an affair of this kind.3 If I started that practice I wouldn't know where to stop--and, after all, I can't have more than some two to three hundred guests in any one season.
Tom Dewey was not asked in December because he was still a Governor, and I have never asked a Governor except in one instance where I had a "beef cattle dinner." At that one I asked Dan Thornton, because he is first of all a cow man, a Governor second.4 A day or two after the dinner on the 20th, my next lists went out. Tom Dewey's name was on one of them. I have not yet heard from him.5
Harold Talbott was asked because he was a member of the Administration and interested in politics. He was not asked merely because he raised money. Incidentally, Tom Pappas is on one of the next lists.6 To repeat, I am doing the best I can in this business, and if people are simply going to have hurt feelings because of a lack of immediate invitation, then I will just have to stop having dinners.
Possibly it would be better for someone else to hold these affairs; Len Hall or Herb Brownell or Art Summerfield--but if I am to have them I repeat that I see no possibility of keeping them secret.7
Many thanks for writing, and again, my best wishes for a fine 1955.
With warm regard, As ever