Dear
Ed: I have delayed answering your letters of February eleventh and February twentieth until I could get a little background information on the question of loans to Mexico.1
The State Department tells me that, contrary to your information, no loan of $110 million was made to Mexico during the Rio Conference. Additionally, they believe that such a loan to Pemex would set a dangerous pattern to governments elsewhere in the world to follow the pattern of Mexico and expropriate foreign oil interests.2
As you probably know, our loans to Mexico are done through the auspices of the Export-Import Bank, the International Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the United States Treasury. It is my understanding that the World Bank has recently extended a substantial credit for the Mexican Pacific Railroad and that the Export-Import Bank has recently authorized a smaller disbursement on one of its railroad credits.3 Perhaps the discussions leading to these loans were carried on at Rio; I do not know.4
However, in a matter like this, I am sure you realize I can only rely upon the judgment of people trained in such dealings and completely familiar with all aspects of the situation. This I must do, despite the fact that I value and respect your knowledge of the Mexican situation.5
I have also the excerpt from Alex Makinsky's letter of the fifteenth; I sincerely hope his gloomy prognosis will not prove accurate.6
To turn to pleasanter things, I had today a nice letter from George, telling me that he will be able to come to a stag dinner on March fifteenth, at which time we are having a number of people from Wyoming and thereabouts.7 I look forward to seeing him again.
Mamie joins me in warm regard to you and Kay. As ever