Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense
: There has been one item on my mind that I forgot to mention at our meeting Saturday.1
As you know, the Military Standing Group is regularly stationed here in Washington; its civilian counterpart--or, I suppose, technically speaking its civilian superior--is located in Paris.2 I believe that it would be a worthwhile effort towards coordination and better understanding to require the Standing Group to go to Paris for a month's work in intimate association with the NATO Council. I believe that such a visit would be very profitable because there are many things of a military nature to be studied and examined there, just as there are many subjects of an economic and political character of which the Standing Group should have intimate knowledge.3
You understand that if this is to take place, it will have to be done on proper request of the governments--probably at the Council of Ministers. Consequently, it could be proposed, if you approve of the idea, at that meeting, as a recommendation from the American group.4
Such a tour of duty would give the Standing Group a chance, on the ground, to look into such matters as size of headquarters, composition of headquarters, supply lines, bases, and all other matters involving infra-structure.
I venture to suggest that such a visit would be feasible and profitable right after the close of the next Ministers' meeting in Europe.
Incidentally, this brings to mind another point. When the new appointment to the position of Chief of Staff is made, I would consider the question as to whether that individual should occupy, also, a position on the Standing Group. At present this is the case. I personally believe that our man on the Standing Group should serve, in his own right, as a representative of the Secretary of Defense and of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.5 This would mean that he should be of the calibre of General Hull.6 I believe that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff cannot function efficiently if he is burdened with this extra work. This is a suggestion--not a directive.