Presidential Papers, Doc#16 To Milton Stover Eisenhower, 2 February 1953. In The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower

Document #16; February 2, 1953
To Milton Stover Eisenhower
Series: EM, AWF, Name Series

The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, Volume XIV - The Presidency: The Middle Way
Part I: Charting a New Course; January 1953 to April 1953
Chapter 1: Developing a spirit of teamwork

 

Dear Milton: Of course, I realize that I shall never be able to follow up each of your acts of assistance to me with a proper word of appreciation and thanks. In the first place, I would never be able to express adequately the degree of dependence that I feel on your wisdom and judgment and devotion--in the second place, I am selfish enough to expect your help to be almost a continuous thing.

Nevertheless, I must say that, in the case of the speech which I am to give within a couple of hours, you have transformed it from something that I almost hated into a document that may be of real value.1 At least I don't resent it.

I hope--and pray--that it contains no blunders that will later arise. The only two items in which I think such could happen are the order to the Seventh Fleet2 and the removal of price controls. In both cases, I believe our contemplated action to be correct; the unpredictable ingredient is public reaction, both here and abroad. In any event, I go on the theory that the Executive of this nation must depend upon the finest set of brains he can mobilize around him. By and large, he must follow the advice of these people or, in the long run, he will so discourage them as to make them useless in a pinch.

Mamie and I were scarcely home from church yesterday when we began to get evidence that the pastor was trying to extract the maximum publicity from the fact that we joined his particular church.3 You will recall that I communicated to you some of my uneasiness about his preliminary actions. But he had very clearly and flatly made a promise to me that "there would be the minimum of publicity--everything would be most quietly done."

The first thing I resented was his announcing our names to the congregation. This may have been necessary under the Presbyterian ritual--of that, I am not sure. But one thing is certain--he did not tell me so, in advance. He allowed me to understand that no announcement of any kind would be made. He stressed the fact that the whole affair would take place in front of a very small group of men (as it did) and that would be the end of the matter.

But assuming that all this was to be anticipated, imagine my shock to find that he called up Jim Hagerty, immediately after the second service on Sunday morning, to ask Jim's approval of a press release.4 Jim objected strenuously, and the pastor came to see him. During their talk, it developed that Dr. Elson had already given out copies of the release to the AP and to the UP.5 There was nothing to do.

I recite this at some length merely to show you why I grow more and more dependent upon my instinct in judging people. During the war, I became almost arbitrary in refusing to employ anyone of whom I did not instinctively approve. Every time I do violate my personal hunches, I regret it.

Oh well–As ever

1 Milton, president of Pennsylvania State University and one of his older brother's closest advisers (see Galambos, NATO and the Campaign of 1952), had spent part of the preceding week in Washington working with Eisenhower and Emmet John Hughes on the State of the Union address; for its main points see no. 14. "On listening to your speech on TV, and reading it once again this afternoon," Milton wrote in reply on February 3 (AWF/N), "I've decided it's a truly great State paper. Emmett Hughes deserves a lot of credit for helping you put it together." On leave from Time, Inc., Hughes had served as one of Eisenhower's speechwriters during the 1952 campaign (Galambos, NATO and the Campaign of 1952, nos. 974 and 1057).

2 See the preceding document.

3 See no. 13.

4 James C. Hagerty, Eisenhower's press secretary (Galambos, NATO and the Campaign of 1952, no. 924).

5 Elson told reporters that the induction ceremony had been "simple and modest," and in keeping with the President's request for privacy, he declined to discuss details. But he went on to say that the ceremony included an examination and confirmation of a candidate's Christian faith and that Eisenhower's decision therefore was the "climax of long consideration by the President and instruction by the pastor." Eisenhower, he went on, "is a man of simple faith, who takes his religious doctrine very sincerely" (New York Times, Feb. 3, 1953).

Bibliographic reference to this document:
Eisenhower, Dwight D. To Milton Stover Eisenhower, 2 February 1953. In The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, ed. L. Galambos and D. van Ee, doc. 16. World Wide Web facsimile by The Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission of the print edition; Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, http://www.eisenhowermemorial.org/presidential-papers/first-term/documents/16.cfm

 


Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission
1629 K Street, NW Suite 801
Washington DC 20006
Phone: 202.296.0004    Fax: 202.296.6464