Presidential Papers, Doc#215 Personal To Robert Wood Johnson, 27 May 1953. In The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower

Document #215; May 27, 1953
To Robert Wood Johnson
Series: EM, WHCF, Official File 103-A ; Category: Personal

The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, Volume XIV - The Presidency: The Middle Way
Part II: Settling into "the long pull"; May 1953 to August 1953
Chapter 3: "A time for continued vigilance"

 

Dear General Johnson:1 Thank you for the confidence you have expressed in this Administration. I am aware of the concern, which has been historical with us, that some day this nation might establish in the Defense organization a military man who would successfully defy civilian controls and set himself up as the "man on horseback."2 This worry was voiced throughout the unification struggle, as you know, and I find the same concern reflected in your approach to the new Reorganization Plan.

I believe that the answer to this question is to be found in the language of the law itself, and in the function and powers of both the President and the Congress in our system of government.

As for the statute, amendments made to that act in 1949 gave the Secretary of Defense almost unlimited control over all activities of the Defense Department.3 He controls the Joint Chiefs of Staff, under the President. He controls the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, under the President. He controls, through the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Staff and its Director. This is all a matter of law and is clearly set out in the statute.

With regard to the office of the President, I think I need only state that the relationship of the Chief Executive to the Defense Department is one of direct command. Consequently, there is ready and immediate authority to curb arbitrary action taken by any person, military or civilian. Moreover, in all Executive matters of substance, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is given no power of decision.4 As presiding officer he does have the management responsibility over the assisting staff--nothing more.

Additional safeguards rest with the Congress, which controls the size of the armed forces and, by the power of the purse, controls their very life. Arbitrary action in any government department, and if not promptly handled by the Executive Branch itself, ultimately finds its way to the Congress and is dealt with there by investigation and by Congressional hearings before legislative, appropriations, or other committees.

Frankly, in the face of this panoply of civilian control over arbitrary action and excessive militarism, I find it difficult to see any valid reason for concern.

The Reorganization Plan will unquestionably improve the efficiency of the Defense Department and will make it possible for the Joint Chiefs of Staff to devote more of their time to their fundamental and grave responsibilities. For these reasons, I am hopeful that the Congress will soon approve it.

Again, thank you for writing to me on this very important matter.5 Sincerely

1 For background on Johnson, chairman of the board of Johnson & Johnson since 1938, see Galambos, Columbia University, no. 780. During World War II he had served in the Army Ordnance Department.

2 Both Johnson's letter of May 13 and an earlier draft of this letter (prepared by White House aide Paul Carroll and bearing Eisenhower's handwritten corrections) are in the same file as this document. Johnson, who described himself as having "total confidence" in Eisenhower and his administration, was concerned about Eisenhower's proposed reorganization of the Defense Department (see no. 207). Johnson said that it seemed "unwise to invest the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff with direct executive powers. This man can best serve his country as presiding officer and moderator to the Service Chiefs. To wholly avoid the threat of undue military influence, we should consider the appointment of an experienced civilian as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff."

In Carroll's original draft this sentence had referred to a military man who might "go beyond" civilian controls; Eisenhower had deleted this expression and had substituted the words "successfully defy."

3 On the 1949 amendments to the National Security Act see Steven L. Rearden, The Formative Years, 1947-1950, vol. I of History of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, ed. Alfred Goldberg, 2 vols. to date (Washington, D.C., 1984- ), pp. 50-55; see also no. 207.

4 Eisenhower added this and the following sentence to Carroll's draft by hand.

5 In his reply (June 1, 1953, same file as document), Johnson would specify two objections to Eisenhower's reorganization. First, he was concerned about the proposal to give the JCS Chairman direct control over the Joint Staff of the JCS. Second, he feared that the effect of the changes would empower the chairman to act in the name of the Secretary of Defense. He added: "Experience in the Pentagon leads me to realize that civilian secretaries pass in parade, but the Staff concept continues without interruption. This in practice results in a constant dimunition [sic] of real civilian authority." As it turned out, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff would receive the power to select and control the members of the Joint Staff when the reorganization plan was implemented in June (Cole et al., Department of Defense, pp. 149-59).

Bibliographic reference to this document:
Eisenhower, Dwight D. Personal To Robert Wood Johnson, 27 May 1953. In The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, ed. L. Galambos and D. van Ee, doc. 215. World Wide Web facsimile by The Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission of the print edition; Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, http://www.eisenhowermemorial.org/presidential-papers/first-term/documents/215.cfm

 


Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission
1629 K Street, NW Suite 801
Washington DC 20006
Phone: 202.296.0004    Fax: 202.296.6464