Dear Butch: I have given thoughtful attention to your letter of May twenty-seventh concerning Commissioner Doerfer, and have made considerable inquiry into the points you raise.1
You would like to know, I am sure, some of the events leading up to Mr. Doerfer's appointment. His name was one of several which were brought before us in early Spring of last year by the National Association of Railroad and Utilities Commissioners, to be considered for service on certain of the utility regulatory agencies, including the Federal Communications Commission. The Association submitted a list of its members, and recommended some of those (including Mr. Doerfer) considered by the Association--as well as the individual's associates--to be the best qualified to serve on the various Federal commissions. The names thus recommended were then checked locally with individuals who personally knew about the prospect's qualifications, including standard political considerations.2
With regard to the rate increase which you mention, I have received from the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission a report of the procedures followed by the Commission in ascertaining the necessary background information for consideration of such rate increases or decreases, and a recital of the facts relating to this particular increase. There was no evidence of any improper handling of this matter.3
Additionally, we can find no substantiation of the specific personal leanings or friendships of which you write. We believe as a result of our inquiries that Mr. Doerfer has discharged his duties well and has made a good Commissioner.4
Thank you very much for your interest in writing so frankly, as well as for your recommendations. I will see that the material about Mr. Haines is passed on to the proper persons for possible future consideration.5 Sincerely
