Presidential Papers, Doc#1147 To Nikita Sergeyvich Khrushchev, 5 May 1959. In The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower

Document #1147; May 5, 1959
To Nikita Sergeyvich Khrushchev
Series: EM, AWF, International Series: Khrushchev

The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, Volume XX - The Presidency: Keeping the Peace
Part VII: Berlin and the Chance for a Summit; March 1959 to August 1959
Chapter 17: "Sources of division" among allies

 

Dear Mr. Chairman:1 I have your reply to my communication of April thirteenth in which I suggested ways in which we might move more rapidly toward the achievement of a lasting agreement for the discontinuance of nuclear weapons tests under adequately safeguarded conditions.2

I do not disagree with your statement of the need to conclude a treaty which would provide for the cessation of all types of nuclear weapons tests in the air, underground, under water, and at high altitudes. This is the objective I proposed last August, which my representatives at Geneva have sought since the beginning of negotiations there, and which in my most recent letter I reaffirmed as the goal of the United States. I sincerely hope that your affirmation of this objective will prove to mean that you would now be willing to accept the essential elements of control which would make this possible.

You refer to the possibility mentioned by Prime Minister Macmillan for carrying out each year a certain previously determined number of inspections.3 I have also been informed that your representative at the Geneva Conference has formally proposed that agreement be reached on the carrying out annually of a predetermined number of inspections, both on the territory of the Soviet Union and on the territories of the United States, the United Kingdom and their possessions.4 In keeping with our desire to consider all possible approaches which could lead to agreement for discontinuance of nuclear weapons tests with effective control, the United States is prepared to explore this proposal through our representatives in the negotiations at Geneva. In particular it will be necessary to explore the views of the Soviet Government on the voting arrangements under which this and other essential elements of control will be carried out, the criteria which will afford the basis for inspection, and the arrangements which you would be prepared to accept to assure timely access to the site of unidentified events that could be suspected of being nuclear explosions. It will be necessary to know, also, the scientific basis upon which any such number of inspections would be determined and how it would be related to the detection capabilities of the control system. I have noted your understanding that these inspections would not be numerous. The United States has not envisaged an unlimited number of inspections, but adheres to the concept that the number should be in appropriate relationship to scientific facts and detection capabilities.

As I stated in my last communication, if you are prepared to change your present position on the veto, on procedures for on-site inspection, and on early discussion of concrete measures for high altitude detection, we can proceed promptly in the hope of concluding the negotiation of a comprehensive agreement for suspension of nuclear weapons tests. I hope that your position on these basic issues will change sufficiently to make this possible.

There are reports that your representative in Geneva has given some reason for thinking the Soviet Government may be prepared to modify its approach regarding these questions.5 If this should prove not to be the case, however, I could not accept a situation in which we would do nothing. In that event I would wish to urge your renewed consideration of my alternative proposal. It is that starting now we register and put into effect agreements looking toward the permanent discontinuance of all nuclear weapons tests in phases, expanding the agreement as rapidly as corresponding measures of control can be incorporated in the treaty. I would again propose that toward this end we take now the first and readily attainable step of an agreed suspension of nuclear weapons tests in the atmosphere up to the greatest height to which effective controls can under present circumstances be extended.6

In my communication of April thirteenth, I suggested that the first phase of such an agreement should extend to the altitude for which controls were agreed upon by the Geneva Conference of Experts last summer. We would welcome discussions of the feasibility at the present time of extending the first phase atmospheric agreement to higher altitudes and our representatives in the present negotiations at Geneva are prepared to discuss the technical means for controlling such an agreement.

It is precisely because of my deep desire for a complete discontinuance of nuclear weapons tests that I urge again that you either accept the measures of control that will make such agreement possible now or, as a minimum, that you join now in the first step toward this end which is within our reach. Such a step would assure that no time will be lost in setting up the elements of the system already substantially agreed and in stopping all tests that can be brought under control. While this is being done our negotiators would continue to explore the problems involved in extending the agreement to other weapon tests as quickly as adequate controls can be devised and agreed upon.7 Sincerely

1 This message, drafted by the State Department, was cabled to the American embassy in Moscow with instructions for delivery to Premier Khrushchev on the afternoon of May 6. Embassy officials were to coordinate the time with British embassy officials, who would be delivering a message from Prime Minister Macmillan on the same day. A copy was also sent to the U.S. permanent representative to NATO to be circulated to the North Atlantic Council, again after coordination with the British (see Goodpaster, Memorandum of Conference, Apr. 28, 1959, AWF/D; see also State, Foreign Relations, 1958 - 1960, vol. III, National Security Policy; Arms Control and Disarmament, pp. 737 - 40).

2 For background see no. 1135. Khrushchev's April 23 reply is in AWF/I: Khrushchev.

3 For Macmillan's proposal to limit inspections see no. 1071.

4 Semen K. Tsarapkin was the Soviet representative to the conference.

5 The Soviets had said that if a quota of inspections were adopted, they would drop their demand for a veto on the dispatch of inspection teams. They also had indicated that defining the events that would qualify for inspection would not present a problem, and they had agreed to the concept of permanent inspection teams. However, they maintained their insistence on veto power over other areas of the inspection process (State, Foreign Relations, 1958 - 1960, vol. III, National Security Policy; Arms Control and Disarmament, Microfiche Supplement, nos. 462, 463, 464; see also ibid., pp. 741 - 42).

6 Eisenhower had told Acting Secretary Herter that he thought it "unwise to use a precise figure like fifty kilometers to define the limit of atmospheric testing" and preferred the general language used in this sentence (Goodpaster, Memorandum of Conference, Apr. 28, 1959, AWF/D). In his April 23 letter Khrushchev had argued that nuclear explosions higher than fifty kilometers would still "poison the atmosphere and the earth, contaminating with radioactive fallout the vegetation which finds its way into the food of animals and into the human organism, just as is occurring at the present time."

7 For developments see no. 1149.

Bibliographic reference to this document:
Eisenhower, Dwight D. To Nikita Sergeyvich Khrushchev, 5 May 1959. In The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, ed. L. Galambos and D. van Ee, doc. 1147. World Wide Web facsimile by The Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission of the print edition; Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, http://www.eisenhowermemorial.org/presidential-papers/second-term/documents/1147.cfm

 


Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission
1629 K Street, NW Suite 801
Washington DC 20006
Phone: 202.296.0004    Fax: 202.296.6464