Dear Jack: Early this winter you wrote me to suggest a major White House Labor-Management Conference on Productivity, to be held in 1960, looking toward the development of labor-management productivity councils.1
I regarded the continuing improvement of productivity as one of the most important of our national economic goals, and I want to do everything that is practicable to promote it. I doubt, however, that it would be wise to try to hold a White House Conference on Productivity this year. A great deal of preparatory work is required for any technical conference, and there is question whether there would be sufficient time to complete all the detailed preparations which would be necessary.2
Moreover I have some reservations about a national conference directed solely to the improvement of productivity. It seems to me that this is only one phase -- a very important one, to be sure -- of the broader problem of labor-management relations, and can best be discussed in that setting.3
I believe that we should do all we can to encourage labor-management discussions away from the bargaining table, especially at the plant level where, after all, the real work is done. Such discussions hold much promise in working out improvements and adaptations in specific work situations, which would lead to greater productivity. The organization of formal "Productivity Councils" might prove to be too limiting. I understand that experience with productivity committees or councils, both here and abroad, has not been particularly impressive.4
I shall continue to stress, as I know you will, the urgent need both for continued gains in productivity and for more frequent discussions by labor and management at all levels to explore their mutual problems.
I appreciate your having made this suggestion.5
With warm regard, Sincerely