Dear Charlie: To my astonishment, not to say chagrin, I find that newspapers are trying to make a lot out of what they call my "rebuke" of you at last Wednesday's press conference.1 I think a reading of the text will dispel any thought that such was my intention.
It is true that I remarked that anyone who enlisted in the National Guard could not be called a draft dodger because he was obeying the law of the land. I said that I knew you were not pointing the finger at any individual--and certainly I was not.
Having disposed of what I thought was the unimportant part of your original statement, I then launched into a defense of your position in demanding the proper training for the Guard. I frankly stated that without six months' prior training, I saw no hope of getting the kind of Guard that we need.2 This I assumed to be the crux of the whole matter.
If my mere observation that I thought your particular words of description concerning the Guard were unwise seemed to you to be a "rebuke," then all I can say is that I hope you will realize that such was not my intention.3
We have worked long and hard together in this business of developing an adequate defense at the lowest possible cost; I have been most deeply appreciative of all you have done and hope that so long as you may care to stay in your post you will continue to discharge your official responsibilities and duties in exactly the same way you have in the past. As ever
P.S. I tried to call you this afternoon, but I understand you have been entertaining the King.4