Dear Mrs. Tower: I appreciate your letter and especially your reference to me as a "retired General of the Army."1 That I consider a high compliment. Never can I possibly lose my feeling of close identification with all Army people and with the Service that for most of my life was the object of my every waking moment.
I have been deeply interested in the question raised in your letter and gave it close attention when the Cordiner proposals were before me.2 You are correct that the proposal as sent to Congress does not include a pay increase for retired personnel. The reason is that the Cordiner proposals were not devised as a pay raise but rather were intended to modernize and revamp the entire pay structure. The purpose was to attract and retain qualified personnel in the military services. At no time was the central object a pay raise. This being so, it was concluded that the use of these proposals to justify an across-the-board retired pay increase would fly in the face of the entire Cordiner approach.
Beyond question the problems you describe are worthy of the most sympathetic concern. Word has already reached me that the Congressional committees studying this subject are certain to weigh very carefully the considerations outlined above, together with all those which you raise. I suppose I don't have to tell you that such decisions as these are far from easy, but I do expect a just solution of this particular problem before the Cordiner proposals finally become law.3
Poor Cornelia--she seemed so unhappy during the last years of her life. I am glad that she gave you the Washington reproduction. If I am not too bold, I shall ask my secretary to send you a Lincoln reproduction as a companion piece.4
With thanks for your letter, and best wishes to you and your husband,5 Sincerely