Dear Bedell: I am enthusiastic about the proposition that Strong puts forward.1
In the meantime, as I contemplate more seriously some of the obstacles that would be encountered in the scheme I discussed with you on the telephone, I have lost some of my own eagerness for it.2 For one thing, in order to cover the period from the year 1942 until the end of ’45, I think we would probably have to have more people present than I first contemplated. In addition, more time might be consumed to do anything intelligible than I had originally thought (that is, I had been considering something on the order of seven to ten days).
There is one variant that I did not mention to you that we might consider and that is to get over here all the British officers that we considered necessary, together with two or three of the more critical ones in the American group, and then to ask others of the Americans to come up from Washington for a day at a time. That would be the only way, as I see it, we could handle as many as we would want to hear.
As far as the time element goes, we might be able to conquer it by having a clear agreement on fundamentals and arranging for a good staff to do the editing and make a final report to each of us. To guide the staff procedures we should probably have to have a little executive committee--for example, you, Spaatz and Strong or Jock Whiteley.3 The three of you could communicate with each other in order to give the necessary guidance for the staff in the editing of the conversations.
Finally, I rather think that if I make the proposal at all I shall make the primary purpose that of an enjoyable reunion, and I would make the recording of reminiscences a secondary purpose. In any event, I rather think I will want to wait until Strong comes over here before I make any further move. (Of course I want to see him, and hope that the two of you will come in together). Certainly it appears that you and he and I seem to be thinking along the same lines.4
With warm regard, As ever