|
An Appreciation by Rocco C. Siciliano
Chairman, Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission
May 2003
As
a man who has spent half of his working life in public service activity,
and who worked for President Eisenhower for six and one-half years,
I obviously have a personal bias. In my view, the legacy of President
Eisenhower is unique. As Chairman of the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial
Commission, I have reflected at length about the meaning and the
long-term significance of what we are doing to memorialize “Ike.”
In the course of this reflection I have arrived at a conviction:
the theme of public service should in some way be central to this
memorial. The proposal below is my personal view of what the Dwight
D. Eisenhower Memorial ought to be.
A
feeling came over me that the expression “The United States
of America” would now and henceforth mean something different
than it had ever before. From here on it would be the nation I would
be serving, not myself. –Dwight
D. Eisenhower, 1952, remembering his first day at West Point
The creation of a new living memorial in the Capital of the United
States is a powerful prospect. Bringing into being a special memorial
by which Americans in all walks of life could be recognized for
their service to America should be considered by the Eisenhower
Memorial Commission. This living memorial would capitalize on the
unique Eisenhower legacy of public service. Few American leaders
in war and peace have won the affection and loyalty of their fellow
citizens as singularly as “Ike.” The reason is obvious:
most Americans can sense that this man made a fundamental choice
to dedicate his life to his country.
In light of this powerful bond between Ike and individual Americans,
a memorial in Eisenhower’s name must be accessible to as many
citizens as possible. A permanent physical site – fully open
to the public – ensures that a voluntary form of reflective
participation in such a memorial could always take place. As a place
at which Americans could recognize and celebrate public service
on behalf of American values both at home and around the world,
this kind of physical memorial would constitute a basic part of
any living memorial program – indeed, it would constitute
the centerpiece of such a program. Developing this combination of
architectural and programmatic elements would of course be the memorialization’s
central challenge.
As President, Eisenhower passionately argued for and sought to build
a memorial to the freedoms for which Americans had died in the 20th
century. No other American president was as knowledgeable about
and committed to memorialization as it related to American values
and sacrifices, especially in service to his country.
Public service is the compelling common theme amid this wide range
of Eisenhower’s achievements. The range of these achievements
is presented in the Eisenhower Legacy Report, which explores the
many ways in which Ike chose to serve the nation. For example, Eisenhower
could be convincingly memorialized either as general or as president.
He could be viewed as the architect of our entry into the space
age. Or, he could be viewed as the leader who changed the nature
of American military power. Or, he could be viewed as the President
who, through an abiding faith in science, paved the way for our
long-term victory in the Cold War, while preserving our democratic
values. Each of these achievements on its own could warrant memorialization.
But, the common theme is obvious: all of them are public service
contributions.
The recognition of public service as a signature of Eisenhower’s
life achievement plays an important role in the programs of the
Eisenhower legacy organizations. Each has brought its own form of
recognition to the essential place of public service in Eisenhower’s
personal and public history. Early major efforts of the Eisenhower
Institute to recognize public servants with the Eisenhower Leadership
Prize – including President George H. W. Bush, General Colin
Powell, Senator Ted Stevens, and Secretary of the Treasury Robert
Rubin – were followed in 2002 with the Eisenhower Institute’s
creation of a Distinguished Public Service Award. The Eisenhower
Institute also produces domestic and foreign policy analyses, encourages
greater public understanding of American governmental institutions,
and provides access to educational and leadership-development opportunities
for our future leaders.
For years the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships (Philadelphia, PA)
have also supported the development of leaders to create international
trust and cooperation and to work for peace. The Eisenhower Center
(Abilene, KS), the American Assembly (New York, NY), and the People
to People program (Kansas City, MO) work within the same ethos.
Even more significant is the grass-roots recognition of Eisenhower’s
public service role by a number of independent local and regional
initiatives that link the name of Eisenhower with a wide range of
public service achievements.
As valuable and important as all of these efforts are — individually
and collectively — none of them constitute the subject matter
of “dinner-table conversation” in American homes. None
of them resonate with the American citizenry as Ike himself did.
If they did achieve this level of public recognition — if
appropriate memorialization had therefore already occurred —
the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission would not have been
established.
The tragic events of September 11 and the war on Iraq accelerated
and have heightened the public’s sense of national purpose
and public service. In the wake of these events, new forms of public
service are being proposed and widely discussed in all sectors of
American society. Novel forms of public and private cooperation
are being advocated as creative responses to past failures and new
needs. The Department of Homeland Security, a large new governmental
organization, was recently created to serve the public’s interests.
In many of these new organizations, the roles, status, and tenure
of the newly reassigned civil servants are being comprehensively
redefined.
Experiencing a sense of urgency in regard to their contemporary
national purpose is not a new experience for Americans. Still present
in the hearts and minds of older Americans is the dissension and
turmoil growing out of the Vietnam War, which resulted in a major
redefinition of public military service. Today, Americans are once
again seeking an appropriate personal and public service response
to the new challenges being posed to their security and well-being.
Vast numbers of American citizens appear to be asking themselves
what they can do to help their country address its challenges. Notwithstanding
major governmental efforts to redefine civil and military service,
Americans are longing for an ethic of public-spiritedness that cuts
across institutions, organizations, and managerial structures. There
seems to be a deeply felt need right now to reaffirm the ties that
bind us, whether through government or outside of it. The time is
right.
Within the framework of this concept, a permanent memorial to Eisenhower
in Washington, D.C., could well become a national memorial to civic
duty and citizenship in general. Conceived in the spirit of service,
the memorial would become the public space in which to recognize
the service of Americans — both mighty and humble —
who chose to live a life that was inspired and exemplified by “Ike.”
The memorial could become a great national and international focal
point for awards and for tributes.
This memorialization proposal envisions two major elements: first,
a physical memorial that encourages public access, participation
and celebration by all visitors; and second, a living memorial program
that focuses on the recognition of high excellence in public service.
The physical memorial itself could be subdivided into two design
elements: a tribute to Eisenhower — as an exemplar, model
and paradigm for public service — and a tribute to the democratic
values of public service that his life exemplified. The two-fold
nature of the physical dimension of the memorialization is crucial.
As with other great leaders, Eisenhower symbolized different things
to many people. But his universal resonance with the American public
was extraordinary and unique. Sites previously considered by the
Commission, such as those located at the intersection of Maryland
and Independence Avenues, SW (near the Capitol) and at Freedom Plaza
on Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (near the White House), lend themselves
to these design parameters.
The living memorial program would utilize the physical memorial
as a showcase — a symbolic national shrine — at which
to honor the service of citizens in many ways. It could sponsor
special awards and opportunities for public recognition. The physical
memorial could serve as a ceremonial location at which agencies
of government, community groups, and public service organizations
could honor and recognize their personnel and volunteers. The overall
administration and management of this living memorial program would
draw upon the experienced leadership of existing organizations,
such as the Eisenhower Institute.
This memorial could even begin a new Presidential tradition: it
could well become the place at which Presidents bestow the highest
honors on American citizens.
Created this way, the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial could quickly
take its place as America’s hallowed ground for the recognition
of public service. A physical memorial designed for such a program
would constitute a worthy tribute to a man who continues to inspire
so many Americans to “live the good life” in civic terms.
The Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission was created to memorialize
Eisenhower — to memorialize him for the qualities that made
him great. The public service of Eisenhower relates to broader values
that always transcend individuals. Throughout his presidency, Eisenhower
stated this point of view and tried – unsuccessfully –
to persuade the members of Congress to build a memorial to express
America’s democratic values, the values for which men died
under his leadership as general and president.
This conception of the Eisenhower Memorial would engage the American
people in a timely manner. It can truly enrich our understanding
of public service and contribute to its redefinition in our own
time. Indeed, it can take its place in our national life as a permanent
exercise in participatory democratic values.
|